In addition to the benefits of vitamin D, anyone supplementing at doses above ~2000 IU daily should be aware that prolonged supplementation at high doses can lead to harmful blood-calcium levels. What's "high doses"? It **very much depending on your individual body,** but almost nobody will have a problem below 2k IU (note that multivitamins & other supplements may also include vitamin D). My source is these social media comments by a [person who claims to be a] parathyroid surgeon (parathyroids are the glands that regulate your calcium levels). https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24063443 She also has a blog with more information on the topic https://www.devaboone.com/blog/categories/vitamin-d -- I try to write short, functional emails. On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:24, Nicholas Arthur via Hidden-discuss <hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net> wrote: > Making sure you get Vitamin D is solid advice from my research. It > will be harder with it getting colder + darker. It's tricky to > supplement it from what I've read (poor absorption). > > The evidence for Vitamin D is not conclusive, but it's enough to take > action on considering that a Vitamin D deficiency is a bad thing > anyway. You can look at papers like this one > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360122/ > > Communication from the scientific community is in a rough place right > now, and there absolutely is financial + political motivations. I > think they are largely "boring", eg, not deep conspiracies but simply > people nudged in a direction by needing to get grant funding, or to > not look stupid, etc. Additionally, it's hard to get a complex > message across. Consider full lockdown, getting outside to get your > Vitamin D would conflict with orders to stay inside. Nobody wants to > look stupid and say "go outside with as much skin exposed to the sun > as possible for exactly 15 minutes, but other than that don't go > outside!". > > Cheers, > Nick