I'm curious if any of you saw this report: http://electromagnetichealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Cell-Phone-Radia tion-and-Health-Recommendations.pdf A summary is found here as well: http://emf.mercola.com/sites/emf/archive/2011/06/18/finally-experts-admit-ce llphones-are-a-carcinogen.aspx It suggests that GSM phones (like AT&T and T-Mobile) can emit about 28 times more RF radiation than their CDMA counterparts (like Verizon and Sprint); that CDMA phones have lower radiation in their signaling technology, vs GSM which issue a high power pulsing technology. I'm less concerned about getting into a discourse in whether one believes that RF or EMF radiation is safe, and would like technical clarity on the following: Modern GSM networks employ W-CDMA on their 3G Networks. Would this actually mean that AT&Ts 3G Network has the same more continuous wave as a traditional CDMA? And to the corollary, when off of Verizon or Sprint's 3G Network, would those GRPS networks emit a higher pulse signal like AT&T's GSM Edge Network? This article seems to suggest that W-CDMA is safer than UMTS, but I thought they were one the same thing. http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2011/06/10/what-is-the-saf est-phone-carrier-to-use.aspx Thanks! Yadim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.hidden-tech.net/pipermail/hidden-discuss/attachments/20111017/62e290c5/attachment.html