Chris, Your comments are correct and I should have chosen my words more carefully. Access certainly is a real RDBMS - however it's limitations in terms of scalabilty should be considered - again to Chris's point, it is impossible to know if Access would be appropriate without fully understanding requirements and constraints. It was not my intention to create a Server-side type of email exchange but after reading my email - you wouldn't think that. On 8/19/11, Chris Duncan, GISmatters <duncan at gismatters.com> wrote: > I don't want to start an overly technical discussion, nor to rumple > feathers, but I think it's worth briefly noting the following in the > interest of not needlessly spreading misinformation: > > While Robert's concerns about scalability are reasonable, his > characterization of Access as a non-relational database system is > simply not correct. There are many good reasons to consider SQL > Server, Oracle, or MySQL (among others), but a lack of support for the > relational model is not one of them. > > The JET database engine that is often used for Access-based projects > is indeed a relational database (I almost wrote "fully relational", > but that is redundant -- there's no "partial" or "fully" to it!). > > Access can also be connected to other (relational) database systems > such as SQL Server or ... as an ODBC data source. > > I am not a cheerleader for Access -- I develop web applications with > both SQL Server and MySQL back-ends -- but Access is certainly a RDBMS > and has its uses (I have several clients using it more than happily). > Without knowing more about Gretta's needs, I'd keep an open mind. > > Chris > > > On 8/19/2011 5:53 PM, Robert Monaco wrote: >> ** Be sure to fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's >> area. >> ** If you did, we all thank you. >> >> >> Suggestion don't use MS access. Use an actual RDBMS that can scale >> with you biz and not require access skills.. If your concerned about >> cost IBM and Oracle have free editions that you can add support to if >> you want. Or you can use mySQL. Data in a relational format will be >> so much more flexible and scalable in the long run. My two cents. >> >> >> On 8/19/11, Gretta Tucker<walkingtalkingtours at gmail.com> wrote: >>> ** Be sure to fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's >>> area. >>> ** If you did, we all thank you. >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- > > Chris Duncan, Ph.D. > President, GISmatters > duncan at GISmatters.com > > http://www.gismatters.com/ > http://www.allterraindigital.com/ > http://www.plugandplaymaps.com/ > > Tel: +1 413.549.2052 > Fax: +1 413.658.0346 > > 1 Tuckerman Ln > Amherst, MA 01002 > -- Sent from my mobile device