I don't want to start an overly technical discussion, nor to rumple feathers, but I think it's worth briefly noting the following in the interest of not needlessly spreading misinformation: While Robert's concerns about scalability are reasonable, his characterization of Access as a non-relational database system is simply not correct. There are many good reasons to consider SQL Server, Oracle, or MySQL (among others), but a lack of support for the relational model is not one of them. The JET database engine that is often used for Access-based projects is indeed a relational database (I almost wrote "fully relational", but that is redundant -- there's no "partial" or "fully" to it!). Access can also be connected to other (relational) database systems such as SQL Server or ... as an ODBC data source. I am not a cheerleader for Access -- I develop web applications with both SQL Server and MySQL back-ends -- but Access is certainly a RDBMS and has its uses (I have several clients using it more than happily). Without knowing more about Gretta's needs, I'd keep an open mind. Chris On 8/19/2011 5:53 PM, Robert Monaco wrote: > ** Be sure to fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's area. > ** If you did, we all thank you. > > > Suggestion don't use MS access. Use an actual RDBMS that can scale > with you biz and not require access skills.. If your concerned about > cost IBM and Oracle have free editions that you can add support to if > you want. Or you can use mySQL. Data in a relational format will be > so much more flexible and scalable in the long run. My two cents. > > > On 8/19/11, Gretta Tucker<walkingtalkingtours at gmail.com> wrote: >> ** Be sure to fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's area. >> ** If you did, we all thank you. >> >> >> > -- Chris Duncan, Ph.D. President, GISmatters duncan at GISmatters.com http://www.gismatters.com/ http://www.allterraindigital.com/ http://www.plugandplaymaps.com/ Tel: +1 413.549.2052 Fax: +1 413.658.0346 1 Tuckerman Ln Amherst, MA 01002