I think one answer is that technology ought to be able to reduce overhead, allowing smaller transactions (and entities) to be viable - especially if there is a high volume of small transactions and traditional methods result in a relatively high fixed cost per transaction. Whether that can apply on due diligence for a loan of $250, to the point that loan can be evaluated profitably as compared with a $250K or $2.5 M loan, I doubt it. But I think there's plenty of room for enhancing the relative value of micro business using micro-transaction technology. I think this applies to making low population density places viable - for example, where the state wants to consolidate school districts, it is primarily the state's overhead cost per district that is driving the presumption that larger districts are more cost effective. But if instead the efficiency focus were on making the various bits of the administrative process less costly to apply to many small entities rather than fewer large entities, perhaps the administrative costs could be driven down while still allowing villages (and small cities) to run their own local schools. The same logic , perhaps, drives the notion that "small business" has to be defined as $5 million in order to gain traction with economic development planners trying to figure out a viable process to apply stimulus. One might just hope for an economy where the macro outlook is growth and international balance, and the govt leaves micro business more or less alone, assuming creative people will figure out ways to apply technology to enhance productivity of very small, very low capital working groups. Where there is consideration given to micro businesses, perhaps the focus should be on making sure the frameworks aren't set up to make it harder for them to exist - for example, there's little justification that health insurance should cost any more for individuals & families or very small businesses than for fortune 500 companies, except in the definition of insurance pools which are established through govt regulation. As well, perhaps, assure that regulations on procurement specs for govt contracts are not designed to thwart competition from micro businesses. Charlie From: Rich [mailto:rich at on-the-net.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 9:47 AM To: Shel Horowitz Cc: rich at tnrglobal.com; HT-discuss Subject: Re: [Hidden-tech] Business stimulus for HT members ? On 12/15/2009 6:57 AM, Shel Horowitz wrote: At 11:43 AM -0500 12/14/09, Rich wrote: With all the discussion of business stimulus I thought I would pass interesting items on as they pass my desk. I am specifically interested to know what HT members are interested in. As with most of you, my business is not the type banks see any value in, no inventory, just a bunch of (smart) people. And that is exactly the point, I get asked by economic development planners, and the only answer I can give so far, is that part of their jobs is to help us determine how the state/fed/etc can help small business. What I have found is that all they do is keep defining small business as bigger, so it's easier for them to work the overhead. BTW, I don't think there is anyone in HT who is what is defined as 'small business' we are now defined as micro-business - small is $5-100Mill So a question to all of you - who is interested in discussing how to get all these agencies spending our money to put in back into HT type businesses ? Great post, Rich. But let me play devil's advocate... Actually I'd rather you (and the rest of HT) be positively creative. Also, I am not necessarily saying HT members should get specific ARRA grants, although for those interested in growth, there are plenty of projects that could our skills in this region -- I might remind all that this area used to have 1,000 of jobs that are now gone - Greenfield had over 4,500 workers in Greenfield Tap and Die. This area has needed the kind of projects that ARRA is sponsoring for decades. The fact it took a total failure of direction and leadership in Washington, Wall Street and Detroit to lead to this is not my concern for this discussion. Yes, we want to be counted as businesses, and yes, the trend to exclude us has gotten worse. But as a taxpayer, I want to see stimulus funds going to job creation, and going to businesses that are hitting a financial wall without help. Many of us H-T folk have little or no inventory, create few if any jobs, and have fairly minimal capital needs (upgrade the computer every few years). If we could tap into the pool of stimulus money for making our homes more energy-efficient, great. But the business stimulus pool should really go to those who are creating jobs. That of course could easily be companies well below 5MM, maybe even as low as 250K--which is still well above my class. What we have in common is we have created businesses with little of the overhead that industrial companies need for meaningful economic contribution. The majority of successful HT businesses bring in business from outside the Pioneer Valley. There is a lot we have to teach. To add to this discussion, I have re-posted a number of economic reports from the older web site, they are at: http://www.hidden-tech.net/skills-report/reports/128-reports-and-resources.h tml I suspect my situation is fairly typical in our circle: I've been in business 28 years and have only created one part-time job (a steady independent contractor, to be accurate). I have no debt other than my home mortgage, have a few thousand dollars worth of inventory (books), and mostly create what wealth I create on the basis of my brainpower and writing/marketing skills. First off you have created at least 2 jobs, if you count yourself - and maybe more if you count family members who 'help out' -- In my case, as well as the 2 dozen or so people I've hired or have been consultants on my projects, both my son and daughter have been involved in businesses in a key area of responsibility -- either their own or others. I submit that people in my situation need reasonably priced creative marketing, not a bailout. Now you are getting to the point I am making - we need to point the various Gov't entities how they can be of help -- and to each other. Please expand more and maybe one of the other HT members can help. _________________________________________________ Shel Horowitz Book shepherd, copywriter/marketing consultant, author, speaker Affordable, ethical, effective marketing materials and strategies "I show the world the *value* in your *values*." Twitter (best way to reach): @shelhorowitz Sign the Business Ethics Pledge - Help Change the World <http://www.business-ethics-pledge.org> <http://www.business-ethics-pledge.org> http://www.principledprofit.com / http://www.frugalmarketing.com mailto:shel at principledprofit.com * 413-586-2388 Award-winning author: Principled Profit: Marketing That Puts People First -- Rich Roth CEO On-the-net Bringing you complex online systems since the net was young http://www.tnrglobal.com - Blog: http://www.rizbang.com Helping move the world: http://www.earththrives.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.hidden-tech.net/pipermail/hidden-discuss/attachments/20091215/0d755182/attachment.html