Wednesday, December 15, 2004, 10:58:23 AM, you wrote: CE> Oh, jeez, I hope not. I still do work for The Hartford (those damn CE> bills need paying), and I can categorically say that large firms like CE> The Hartford have no interest in trolling around a backwater business CE> network's skills directory (sorry if it sounds harsh, but that's their CE> perspective). They fill requisitions through professional recruiters CE> and internal HR searches. Hidden-Tech is not on their radar, and I CE> hope they are not on ours. Actually you are quite wrong -- while the Hartford might be so short sighted, Mass Mutual has members in our db and has contacted HT members for various projects -- if any have specific reports, please speak up. CE> Beyond that, I agree with everything Andy said. And, I guess I would CE> add a question: if the skills directory that is already available is CE> going to continue to function as the main data source for recruiting, CE> etc. (as was indicated by Amy in an email yesterday), then exactly what CE> is this skills survey adding to the process/site/group? I suppose my CE> main point is that a greater degree of visibility into what the CE> steering committee is driving towards would greatly help the membership CE> to know how to respond to RFI's, etc. Your point is well taken but somewhat off target, partly due to how the discussion thread drifted -- the current member directory has a open text spot to post your skills but no knowledge of skill categories and only searchable by keyword - consider it a database (goggle) as opposed to a directory with drill down by category (yahoo). The survey, the discussion is contributing to, is first and foremost a study of the skills of the group. It will be used to convince the various planning and funding agencies that there is a solid base here that should be included and supported as part of various economic growth initiatives. What exactly that means remains to be seen. We hope it also will lead to making the member directory more useful both for members in including other members in their projects and possibly for recruiters. -- Best regards, Rich mailto:rich at on-the-net.com