[Hidden-tech] Rural fast internet

Sat Jun 13 18:22:31 UTC 2020

Hi Deb,

I have family and a lot of friends who are EMF sensitive and I believe 
they are the canaries in the coal mine in terms of our EMF exposure. I 
am worried about 5G as well.

Starlink doesn't use 5G, which is in the 3.5-4.2 GHz range; it uses a 
number of frequencies that are normally used for satellite communication 
- 10.7-12.7 GHz, 13.85-14.5 GHz, 17.8-18.6 GHz, 18.8-19.3 GHz, 27.5-29.1 
GHz, and 29.5-30 GHz bands. There are a few reasons why Starlink doesn't 
have anywhere near the potential for damage as 5G.

5G is a somewhat higher frequency than 4G (2-8GHz) and 3G (1.8-2.5GHz). 
The higher the frequency, the more energy is needed to penetrate 
structures like buildings and the more it needs to be line of site. 
Because of this, and because they're carrying a lot more information, 
they need a lot more antennae with a total higher energy than 3G or 4G 
which means a lot more exposure of the population to EMF.

Because Starlink is just sending radio waves to and from a receiver 
exposed to the sky and it doesn't need to penetrate buildings, the 
amount of energy needed is far lower. Also, Starlink uses a phased array 
antenna which uses a narrow beam that is targeted between the antennae, 
not omnidirectional like cell phones, radios, TV, etc. so the amount of 
EMF received drops off pretty quickly as you get farther from the antenna.

Sam

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sam McClellan
*Itabix, Inc*
/One place for all things Web/
sam at itabix.com
https://itabix.com
Main - 413.587.4600
Toll-free - 877-7ITABIX (877.748.2249)

On 6/13/2020 12:21 PM, Deborah Chandler wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> With all due respect, folks need to realize that if they invite 5G 
> into their homes, they could very well be inviting severe health issues.
>
> As someone who already experiences health issues from 2, 3 and 4G. And 
> honestly, it is near impossible to get an honest answer from the 
> telecom industry as to where their 5G is already deployed. I have 
> tried to ask Verizon where their 5G towers are, and they refuse to 
> answer, citing vandalism as the reason)
>
> I strongly discourage exposure to 5G. Someone may not feel the effects 
> right away, but down the road will likely suffer with anxiety, 
> depression, memory loss, tinnitus, digestive issues, sleep 
> disturbance, heart attacks, congestive heart failure, cancer, 
> diabetes, dementia...and with the second wave of Covid predicted for 
> the fall, some of these symptoms will be blamed on Covid.
>
> Please use due diligence, do your research. Visit www.5Gcrisis.com 
> <http://www.5Gcrisis.com> and check out the many groups, some on 
> Facebook, who are focused on these issues. Plenty of videos on YouTube 
> (and because YouTube is censoring, try Bitchute and LBRY). I am happy 
> to provide links and direct folks to the key people who are fighting 
> the 5G deployment. In MA, Cece Doucette in Ashland is heading the 
> charge, filing bills with our legislators. She travels all around, 
> doing workshops on these issues. We all know the telecom lobbyists are 
> being incredibly persistent with our legislators, and money is no 
> object. It is a tough battle. We have an unalienable right to protect 
> our very health and wellbeing.
>
> Thanks for listening,
> Deb
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020, 11:13 AM Sam McClellan via Hidden-discuss 
> <hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net 
> <mailto:hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net>> wrote:
>
>     For those of you who are stuck on dial-up or expensive satellite
>     or even slow DSL, Elon Musk's (Tesla, SpaceX) company Starlink is
>     planning to start opening their satellite internet up for beta
>     testers by late summer/early fall and general availability soon
>     after.
>
>     Starlink is different than HughesNet and Viasat in two ways -
>     their satellites are in much lower orbit and there will be many
>     more of them, so the latency (time between when you click the
>     button and when things happen) is the same or quicker than cable.
>     Their upload/download speed and pricing should also be comparable
>     to cable as well, although no numbers have been released yet.
>
>     They will have an antenna described as "a large pizza box on a
>     stick" that will automatically align itself to point to
>     satellites, and they say setup should be as simple as attach the
>     receiver to your deck railing or house where it has a view of the
>     sky, plug it into your router/computer, plug it into the wall
>     socket, let it align and you're set.
>
>     If you're interested, you can sign up to get updates and to
>     possibly get to be a beta tester here:
>     https://www.starlink.com/
>
>     Sam
>     -- 
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Sam McClellan
>     *Itabix, Inc*
>     /One place for all things Web/
>     sam at itabix.com <mailto:sam at itabix.com>
>     https://itabix.com
>     Main - 413.587.4600
>     Toll-free - 877-7ITABIX (877.748.2249)
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net
>     Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net
>     <mailto:Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net>
>
>     You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech
>     Discussion list.
>     If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members
>     page on the Hidden Tech Web site.
>     http://www.hidden-tech.net/members
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hidden-tech.net/pipermail/hidden-discuss/attachments/20200613/ee646481/attachment.html>