The idea of moving people to action via curiosity actually has a name: Zeigarnik Effect. It's well-known in the marketing world, especially (but not exclusively, by a long shot) in the work of Mark Joyner. BTW, I am Member #11 at River Valley Co-op, which has now grown well past 10,000 members. I always get a kick out of going in there, giving my owner number, and watching the cashier's jaw drop (especially the time the person in front of me happened to have a number somewhere around 9700). Of course, the flip side was that the first few years until the store opened, I had a coffee mug that essentially cost me $150. But I've been a member of some food co-op or other almost the entire time since 1975, in DC, Atlanta, Providence, and the Valley--and have had River Valley and several other co-ops as well as the Co-op Development Institute as marketing clients over the years. Shel Horowitz - "The Transformpreneur"(sm) ________________________________________________ Watch (and please share) my TEDx Talk, "Impossible is a Dare: Business for a Better World" *http://www.ted.com/tedx/events/11809 <http://www.ted.com/tedx/events/11809>** <http://www.ted.com/tedx/events/11809>* (move your mouse to "event videos") Contact me to bake in profitability while addressing hunger, poverty, war, and catastrophic climate change Twitter: @shelhorowitz * First business ever to be Green America Gold Certified * Inducted into the National Environmental Hall of Fame http://goingbeyondsustainability.com mailto:shel at greenandprofitable.com * 413-586-2388 Award-winning, best-selling author of 10 books. Latest: Guerrilla Marketing to Heal the World (co-authored with Jay Conrad Levinson) _________________________________________________ On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 6:51 PM Aaron E-J via Hidden-discuss < hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net> wrote: > Oh, this text is just some very preliminary thoughts. I agree that 'job > fair' is not the best name for it - if anyone has a better name, I'm all > ears. > > I wouldn't use 'holon' in public text without any reference. The reason > I used it in this email is because I added a link to more information and I > really like the concept. In retrospect, also because using one or two > obscure terms that have a lot of relevance to the topic on hand makes > people more engaged in the topic because not knowing something irks you and > makes you need to find out more (didn't really think about that aspect of > things at the time, but I think it is often the case, at least for the > literarily inclined). > > I totally agree that using negative condonation is not productive (hence > why our government is in total stand still). That is actually the whole > point of the project – to get rid of resentment and be more productive. It > is really hard to not do it though, and I guess in this context I was > trying to lay out the case that no one is at fault, it is the system that > is the problem. > > I have been a strong proponent of the worker coop model for a long time > and am a River Valley and Common Share food coop member (I actually served > on the board of Common Share Coop a number of years back when it was still > Amherst Community Coop). > > Aaron E-J > The Other Realm LLChttp://otherrealm.orghttp://theotherrealm.org (Blog) > > On 2019-09-27 6:50 AM, Christine Dutton wrote: > > Interesting proposal! I recommend some language adjustments to the > proposal. : > (a) An alternative term to the term "job fair" > (b) An alternative to the term "holon" that is more commonly used > (c) Changes to this language to form more positive language: "It can > often result in needing to compromise your moral principles and spend most > of your time doing things in areas you are not passionate about. Constantly > needing to be judged and being told that you are not as good as someone > else who got the job you wanted, puts a tremendous toll on your wellbeing > and desire to interact with others. On the other side, someone looking > to hire the right person has to spend a considerable amount of time wading > through tons of applicants before eventually arriving at someone you > actually want to hire. And if you have an ounce of empathy, constantly > needing to turn people down because they are not the right fit feels > horrible." > > Also, there is a lot of knowledge to gain from talking to professionals in > the worker cooperative and grocery cooperative industries. There is vast > amounts of knowledge through some organizations and consultants associated > with these industries. > > Regards, An HR & Marketing Consultant > *Christine Dutton* > *Dutton Consulting * > *413-626-6377* > > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:38 PM Aaron E-J via Hidden-discuss < > hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net> wrote: > >> This discussion of the need to work for less than a fair >> wage got me thinking of an idea I had a while back. The idea is a kind >> of 'jobs fair' that would be open to anyone, and anyone who attended would >> be either guaranteed a job or funding for a startup. The amount of time >> that people spend competing for: first a college degree, then a job, then >> maybe funding for a business idea, is enormous. It can often result in >> needing to compromise your moral principles and spend most of your time >> doing things in areas you are not passionate about. Constantly needing >> to be judged and being told that you are not as good as someone else who >> got the job you wanted, puts a tremendous toll on your wellbeing and desire >> to interact with others. On the other side, someone looking to hire the >> right person has to spend a considerable amount of time wading through tons >> of applicants before eventually arriving at someone you actually want to >> hire. And if you have an ounce of empathy, constantly needing to turn >> people down because they are not the right fit feels horrible. >> >> The way I conceived of the 'job fair' working would be in >> two stages. >> >> The first stage would be a sign up and stakeholder gathering >> phase. Job seekers would fill out an online form detailing their skills >> and interests and any ideas for solutions to unsolved problems they had. >> Employers (worker coops and businesses that agree to not throw their >> employees under the proverbial bus if the job does not work out) would sign >> up and agree to employ people to work *with* them and not *for* them. Business >> investors and venture capitalists would sign up and work on forming >> business ideas with people who do not see an existing role with any of the >> existing business that are hiring. >> >> Then the second stage would be the actual conference where >> everyone gets to know each other and job seekers and job fillers seek >> mutual skills and interests. The people who do not have career goals >> and skills in line with those being sought, and those with business ideas >> they are looking to actualize, would work with the business investors and >> venture capitalists. Together, they would form new worker cooperative >> businesses around the solutions previously identified in the first stage >> that everyone on the table can get behind. These cooperatives would act >> as holons <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holon_(philosophy)>, each >> independent entities, but with the ability to utilize each other's >> resources to some extent. There would also be a buffer fund established >> that all the cooperatives earning a positive income would contribute to and >> those needing a more income could draw from. The way the investors >> would get compensated is that they would be seen as one of the cooperatives. >> If the investors want to withdraw some of their investment, their >> financial balance would be negative and therefore a proportion of the >> buffer fund will go to them. This siphoning of money to an investor >> will only continue until a previously agreed upon return on investment is >> achieved or the person invests more money back into the system. Because >> the contribution will only be a portion of the *profit*, if some or all >> cooperatives are not earning a profit, they will not need to contribute to >> the buffer. Obviously exact details will need to be worked out when >> more people get involved, but that is the general way I am envisioning the >> financing working. It may also make sense to involve colleges and >> others in the education sphere. They could be seen as business >> investors. Although they may not be providing financial support, they >> can still provide significant resources and as a result have a share of the >> profit. However, the exact nature of their compensation would need to >> be figured out because education is rarely easily quantifiable. >> >> The important point in all this is that people are not >> competing – there would be the explicit edict that no one is left out and >> no one is forced to do things they have no desire to do (of course it may >> be necessary for some people to do undesired tasks, but these tasks should >> be for the purpose of fulfilling desired goals). >> What do people think of this idea and is anyone interested >> in working on it with me? I would not be surprised if we could get some >> grant funding to get the ball rolling. >> >> >> Aaron E-J >> The Other Realm LLChttp://otherrealm.orghttp://theotherrealm.org (Blog) >> >> On 2019-09-26 2:30 PM, Deborah Chandler via Hidden-discuss wrote: >> >> Ha! Our replies came in at the same time, Todd. Are you still involved >> with the Graphic Artists Guild? >> >> Deb >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 1:56 PM Todd LeMieux <todd at toddlemieux.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Great replies, and I completely agree. >>> >>> I really haven’t seen this in any other industry outside of creative >>> services (designers, web developers, photographers, musicians, etc) >>> “contests” to get essentially free work (and usually underpaid, for the >>> “winner”, if there is any payment involved). It’s just plain wrong. >>> >>> Deb, your point is a valid comparison. Imagine having a similar contest >>> for bookkeeping services, or for legal representation? You get the point. >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> Todd >>> >>> ------------------- >>> >>> Todd M. LeMieux >>> 413.237.6869 >>> [Graphic Design + Creative Direction] >>> >>> Twitter <http://twitter.com/toddmlemieux> | LinkedIn >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/toddmlemieux/> | Facebook >>> <http://www.facebook.com/toddmlemieux> >>> >>> Good Design Will Prevail.™ <https://www.behance.net/toddlemieux> >>> >>> On September 26, 2019 at 1:43:29 PM, Deborah Chandler via Hidden-discuss >>> (hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net) wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jessica, >>> >>> I agree with Rich. If your business is a profit-making business which >>> offers services to help people thrive, then paying for graphic design >>> services are helping a qualified graphic designer to "thrive". >>> >>> What you have proposed is called "spec work", where you are only willing >>> to pay for a "winning" design. This spec work is frowned upon in the >>> graphic design industry. Imagine you sit down at a restaurant and you ask >>> them to serve you 6 different dishes, you try each one, and only pay for >>> the one you found tasty. You would never do that. Not many professions deal >>> with this issue the way creatives do. And the Graphic Artists Guild, among >>> others, speak up about it, have worked on Pricing and Ethical Guidelines >>> (PEGS) for just these types of issues, and support their members as they >>> adhere to these industry guidelines. >>> >>> You may be unaware of this issue, you may have seen other people do >>> contests like this and thought it was okay to do. But please be aware that >>> it is not accepted in our industry, and I for one, kindly request that you >>> choose to hire a qualified graphic designer and negotiate fees that pay >>> them a good rate for their good work. If you are not familiar with this >>> hiring process, how to choose a qualified designer, I am sure there are >>> many folks here who can help you out with that, and some will be willing to >>> quote on your project and provide trusted advice on various aspects of the >>> process through to completion. >>> >>> Best on this project, >>> Deb >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 8:27 AM Jessica Gifford via Hidden-discuss < >>> hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I'm running a design contest for the back and box of a customized deck >>>> of *Connection Cards*, which are used in a program that helps >>>> participants get to know new people, build social connections, and develop >>>> friendships. Each card has a question that participants answer as part of >>>> the program. There will be a $150 prize for the winning design. You >>>> may email jessica at growingwellness.life for entry guidelines. Please >>>> pass along to anyone who may be interested. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> Jessica >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>>> Jessica Gifford, LICSW >>>> www.growingwellness.life >>>> 413-548-4688 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net >>>> Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net >>>> >>>> You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion >>>> list. >>>> If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members >>>> page on the Hidden Tech Web site. >>>> http://www.hidden-tech.net/members >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net >>> Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net >>> >>> You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion >>> list. >>> If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members >>> page on the Hidden Tech Web site. >>> http://www.hidden-tech.net/members >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.netHidden-discuss@lists.hidden-tech.net >> >> You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion list. >> If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members >> page on the Hidden Tech Web site.http://www.hidden-tech.net/members >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net >> Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net >> >> You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion list. >> If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members >> page on the Hidden Tech Web site. >> http://www.hidden-tech.net/members >> > > _______________________________________________ > Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net > Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net > > You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion list. > If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members > page on the Hidden Tech Web site. > http://www.hidden-tech.net/members > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.hidden-tech.net/pipermail/hidden-discuss/attachments/20190927/45f3fbc6/attachment.html>