[Hidden-tech] Stock Photo Sites

Tom Adams ~ Reelife Productions & Folktography tomadams at gmail.com
Tue Sep 29 14:18:36 EDT 2015


Hi all,

interesting results I'm seeing... Lots of choices indeed. And I'll toss out
another option... I would be honored to offer any of my photos for the same
going rate as whatever stock photo place you're working with. While I'm
well aware that I may not have that perfect shot of a busy intersection in
Manhattan with a business woman and business man exchanging coy glances at
each other.... I do have 65,000+ photos to choose from in my digital
photography archives... and I'd be willing to be that there are plenty
other local photographers that would be willing to do the same. I certainly
understand the convenience of online-stock-photo-shops (I use them myself
sometimes:)
Just thought I'd mention it...

*Regards,*

*Tom Adams, Director/Owner*
*Reelife Documentary Productions & Folktography by Tom*
<http://www.reelifeproductions.com/Tom_Adams_Links_2.html>
Producing Media that Educates, Entertains & Enlightens... since 1996
*• Cool Media Production...Not Boring or Dumb •*
*(413) 575-9707*
* • Williamsburg, MA*


On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Bruce Hooke <bghooke at att.net> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> I've found iStockPhoto to be a useful resource for reasonably priced stock
> photos but to me a great deal depends on your needs and budget. Do you need
> one or two images every few months or half a dozen images every week? Is
> "reasonably priced" $10 or $15 (for a pretty good image) or is $40
> "reasonable" especially if it gets you an image with more impact? To
> someone who has been in the field for many years even $100 can seem pretty
> reasonable when a single image for a book cover might go for upwards of
> $1000. Do you mostly need low-resolution images, in which case a place that
> charges less for low-resolution images could save you money, or do you
> commonly need higher resolution images in which case a place that charges a
> more fixed price is the better deal. For someone who needs stock images
> every week a subscription makes a lot of sense. For someone who just needs
> one or two images every once in a while a subscription would likely be a
> waste of money.
>
> Bruce
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* hidden-discuss-bounces at lists.hidden-tech.net [mailto:
> hidden-discuss-bounces at lists.hidden-tech.net] *On Behalf Of *Christine
> Dutton
> *Sent:* Monday, September 28, 2015 6:09 PM
> *To:* Hidden-Tech Listserv
> *Subject:* [Hidden-tech] Stock Photo Sites
>
> Hello,
> Please share your favorite reasonably prices stock photo sites that have
> large media libraries.��
> Thank you!��
> Christine
> ------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2015.0.6140 / Virus Database: 4435/10715 - Release Date: 09/28/15
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net
> Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net
>
> You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion list.
> If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members
> page on the Hidden Tech Web site.
> http://www.hidden-tech.net/members
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.hidden-tech.net/pipermail/hidden-discuss/attachments/20150929/9e18f329/attachment.html 


Google

More information about the Hidden-discuss mailing list