This is a subject that has interested me for some time. Here some notes which I hope are useful: I follow the literature in a couple of professional journals about EM fields. The jury is still contemplating the medical impact of EM fields. There are many factors involved: Frequency, pulsed or non-pulsed source, power level, etc. The list goes on. So: Yes, wired is better, but it will not eliminate the fields if you are concerned. The transmission of alternating current of any frequency causes an electromagnetic (EM) field. That said, I don't worry a whit about fields contained by two wires, as the field is mainly contained between the wires. This is not a radiating field. Radio fields are a far different issue, however. They are a radiating fields, which, in theory, goes unto infinity. I am concerned when they are local to me. The issue is 'how' local? That's a difficult question to pin down. Meters. Sorry, but I wouldn't trust anything you can afford to buy to be very accurate. I assume that $10K to $50K is outside of most HTers budget. When I have to talk a field strength measurement, I usually use some cheap instrument, get a number & then calibrate that reading against a signal source in the lab. If I am within a factor of 5 or so, that's probably good enough. Field strength measurements are difficult to take, and more difficult to prove to any reasonable accuracy. The answer is not yet in on cell phones. There are about as many papers that claim there might be a problem as there are that say there is no problem. But there are a few things you can do to lower your exposure: 1. The EM field (radio field) from any decreases as the square of distance. That is the power density is reduced by 4 for doubling distance. So move the thing away from your head. Any earphones will do this. 2. Cell phones increase their transmit power level if the signal from the tower gets reduced. Likewise, power is reduced as received signal strength increases. This is done to conserve handset battery power. So keep the thing further from you when you hear a choppy or weak signal. 3. A bluetooth device is also a radio transmitter. Most, but not all, operate at a much lower power level. You might consider a bluetooth earpiece if it doesn't advertise "has a great range" or some such thing that indicates it is of higher than normal power output. You can look all this up on the FCC web site (www.fcc.gov). All you need is the alphanumeric characters after the words FCC ID: on the back of the device. Spaces in that character set MUST also be entered. The first three letters is the manufactures "Grantee Code" any space and the remaining is the manufacture's self assigned item code. 4. Literature. The Sweeds and Fins are into worrying about medical issues and cell phones. Their studies have some scientific rigor. Magnetic fields; These are a completely different thing. Do not confuse them with the magnetic field of the AC power line. The power line has an electromagnetic (EM) field, just like radio, but of a very, very lower frequency compared to radio. On the other hand a true magnetic field is static, exactly like the magnetic field of the Earth. We humans have evolved with that field and I don't see that it has done us in yet. It looks like a 1/2 Gauss magnetic field is OK. There are also much larger static magnetic fields, for example used in an MRI scan, or from a rare earth speaker magnet. Some of these might not be healthy for some folks. Jim Ussailis jim at nationalwireless.com Original Message: ----------------- From: matt lampiasi mattl at florenceit.net Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:12:19 -0400 To: hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net Subject: Re: [Hidden-tech] EMF/radiation-reducing cell phone head sets andother products ** Be sure to fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's area. ** If you did, we all thank you. -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web.com What can On Demand Business Solutions do for you? http://link.mail2web.com/Business/SharePoint