I'm obviously a computer guy and a social media guy, but I have to agree with Claudia, I read more hidden tech discussions in my email than I ever would on LinkedIn. I do follow the LinkedIn group, but not as close. For email I read that on my phone a lot of the time. Paul Stallman - Owner, Creative Director, Web Guru paul at alias-solutions.com 413.364.6147 How will the world know you? *alias*|solutions web design | graphic design | online marketing <http://www.alias-solutions.com/>www.alias-solutions.com SCAN THIS QR CODE TO ADD ME TO YOUR MOBILE PHONE On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Claudia Gere <Claudia at claudiagereco.com>wrote: > ** Be sure to fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's area. > ** If you did, we all thank you. > > > For those of you not on LinkedIn, I've summarized the poll results below. > > Cheers, Claudia > > Claudia Gere & Co. LLC > Helping smart people become outstanding authorsT > > Be an Author Webinar starts in January > http://www.claudiagereco.com/speaking/be-an-author-webinar/ > Follow me on Twitter: @claudiagere > Join me on LinkedIn > Claudia at ClaudiaGereCo.com > www.ClaudiaGereCo.com > +1 413 259 1741 > > > > > Here is are the results of the vote and the 12 comments. There is also some > demographic info (age and sex) that I haven't summarized. > > 22 voted to keep the traditional email list > 9 were in favor of having the discussions on LinkedIn with an email digest. > Here are the 12 comments. > > COMMENTS: > Yes, it would be great if the "survey" text move to the bottom so preview > would work. Yes to email, no to LinkedIn. > > Personally I find LinkedIn groups even more prone to the noise problem than > email. I end up ignoring 90% of it. Also, is someone actively managing the > LinkedIn group? It took a couple months before my membership was approved. > > Let me add my vote to move the annoying survey language to the bottom. This > would make it possible to preview the mail without opening it. I used to > get > digest but switched to individual e-mail. In Eudora, I can hold the option > key and get all messages that share a subject line--which means if someone > is asking some techie question about which version of PHP to use (I don't > know and don't care, not a programmer), I can mass-delete and move on--but > if there's a thread I'm interested in, it's a snap to read all the posts at > once even if they were separated by time. > > I Prefer Email, I use Google apps/gmail client which groups into > conversations, if subject is of no interest I delete them. If I had to > login > or go elsewhere I would not do so. If you set up folders in your email > client, email can skip the inbox and go to a dedicated folder, and you will > not receive a blackberry notification. > > For my part, email works better. I can scan quickly, hit the delete key, > and move on. If it catches my interest, I can linger and/or respond. My > email is always there. As people move to forums, I have to stop and think, > gee, what forum have I not checked. Should I take time to run out (on the > web) and check LinkedIn, Facebook, Google+, yahoo groups, linux questions, > . > . . . Put all those lists in forums, and I just won't ever bother to check. > Too busy. > > How would the digest work? By thread, or daily? (Daily works for me, but I > can see the benefit of either). The challenge of a thread digest is that > there may be many short threads, and people may not always change the > topic, > so it can get messy. Hmm...I think I've just talked myself into the daily > digest. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net > Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net > > You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion list. > If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members > page on the Hidden Tech Web site. > http://www.hidden-tech.net/members > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.hidden-tech.net/pipermail/hidden-discuss/attachments/20111029/aa02cebf/attachment.html