I've used Sprint (CDMA) and AT&T (GSM) within the last few years, and I've noticed that the GSM phones cause tons of interference with other electronics, while the CDMA phones caused none. Also, earlier this year I read a good technical article comparing GSM and CDMA: bottom line, CDMA's spread-spectrum technology is more efficient, and it's noticeably less prone to cutouts and dropped calls. So regardless of health effects, that a pretty good reason to use Sprint or Verizon. My understanding is that all G3/G4/LTE *internet* traffic is sent using a CDMA-like protocol even on GSM carriers, but they still use GSM for voice calls. That should be changing within, oh, the next decade or two. -Tom On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Tom Kopec <tek at acm.org> wrote: > ** Be sure to fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's area. > ** If you did, we all thank you. > > > Why don't you post the question on the sites you quoted and see what > they have to say? They seem to have and army of "experts". They kind of > lost credibility with me when I got to the quote : > "Even if you don't use a cell phone and your home is wireless-free, you > can be exposed to microwave radiation from your neighbor's wireless > devices.." > > That's just plain sensationalism. > > The quote: > ".. because the SAR rating has nothing to do with the non-ionizing > radiation emitted.." is flat wrong. I have serious problems with the use > of SAR in rating phone safety (see below), but SAR most certainly deals > with non-ionizing radiation - that's what RF is. > > So, unless you already wear a tinfoil hat, I'd take these articles with > a large grain of sea salt. Just don't keep your cellphone glued to your > ear (or hand, in the case of a smartphone) all day, and if you've > decided to replace your landline with cell, get a wired headset. Simple > precautions such as this will have a far greater impact. > > That said, you'll probably end up with less harmful cellphone exposure > if you are using a carrier that has good coverage where you will be > using your phone. All cellular technologies (as far as I'm aware) adjust > their power output based on need. > > (my background: in 1980, my assigned final paper topic in Microwave > Engineering II was "Microwave Radiation Hazards". In researching it I > found that, even then, the use of SAR-like metrics was considered by > many to be an inappropriate measure of hazard even for some > continuous-wave emissions.) > > ...tom