The current Thunderbird is a long way from earlier versions, it has a global pre-index, which I personally don't like but works well for many. On the other hand I NEVER will use outlook or allow it as an supported company option call it my "MS has too many strikes against it to trust it" theory. Rich BTW - there is no reason for " (was Re: reducing gmail tips)" on these messages, unrelated discussion On 5/2/2011 8:00 AM, Shel Horowitz wrote: > Thanks, Andrew. Thunderbird is another one that I tried years ago and > didn't like the interface. I might give it another look. > >> We use both Gmail and Mozilla Thunderbird. So far pretty content with them. >> > At 11:18 PM -0400 5/1/11, Paul Stallman wrote: >> 10 years is a long time. MTV played videos still 10 years ago., >> gmail didn't exist, mark zuckerberg was a junior in high school, >> and the mac still had a version of IE. :) >> >> It's worth taking a peak at anyway. > Paul, I took a look this morning. From what I can tell from MS's very > anemic webpage for Outlook/Mac, http://www.microsoft.com/mac/outlook > , there's very little info on its feature set; the page seems to be > geared for Outlook users switching form PC. And the only review I > could find bitched about its lack of integration with some particular > calendar and didn't discuss its e-mail capabilities at all. > > But the biggest problem is the lack of a stand-alone version. I don't > really want to buy a new copy of Office just to experiment with a new > e-mail client. -- Rich Roth CEO On-the-net Bringing you complex online systems since the net was young http://www.tnrglobal.com - Blog: http://www.rizbang.com Helping move the world: http://www.earththrives.com