One other item to be aware of if you decide to use Amazon is that it is very important to plan for a system failure. Amazon virtual servers can- and will- become inaccessible, or worse, will just completely fail. It's not a matter of if- it's a matter of when. In our experience- the failure rate is much higher statistically than with physical servers. You just need to design with that in mind (and of course- with virtual servers- that is easier and less costly anyway). Of course- the Amazon discussion assumes you don't already own the hardware. If so- then you already have sunk costs and you do need to find a colo. In that regard, keeping it local if possible- I'd definitely talk to Crocker as you mentioned. They have good support and they are easily accessible in Springfield. I will also agree with Rich regarding the timeline- 2 weeks is not unreasonable for getting a couple of servers up and running in a colo. Good luck! MK On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Rich Roth <webmaster at hidden-tech.net>wrote: > ** Be sure to fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's area. > ** If you did, we all thank you. > > > > While EC2 is a good option, in fact. we have clients trashing older > servers as they come off maintenance and switching > strictly to EC2 - there is still a learning curve and they have their own > quirks it takes time to learn - we've been > using the for about 2 (or is it 3) years and have about 50-60 instances > there. > > Frankly I'd suggest being a bit patient -- getting a new machine up in 2 > weeks in a colo you've never > use before is not unreasonable. And I've always found Crocker to be most > helpful -- we have a few machines > there > > Rich > > On 3/19/2011 5:53 AM, Wesley Rosner wrote: > > David, > > > Have you given any thought to using virtual servers at Amazon instead. > Amazon EC2 provides all the same benefits (except it isn't your hardware), > it's cheaper, it's on demand, and you could have a server up in minutes > instead of days. > > I have been running several servers on the EC2 platform with just GREAT > results. I think Amazon's AWS cloud architecture is just amazing. > > Just a thought. > > > > Thanks > > > > Wes > -- > > Wesley Rosner > > President > > Blue Fox, Inc. > > P.O. Box 466 > > Shelburne Falls, MA 01370 > > > 413.625.2199 x1001 (Work) > > 413.575.4848 (Mobile) > > > wrosner at blue-fox.com > > www.blue-fox.com > > > "I.T. That Works" > > > > On Mar 18, 2011, at 5:56 PM, R. David Murray wrote: > > I'm looking to find a cololocation service at which to site one or > two 1U servers. I don't need much bandwidth, but good connectivity is > a requirement. I talked to Crocker and won't be able to get pricing > until Monday. I was told it would take 10 days to get set up, which > might be too long. So it looks like I may need to go to someplace near > or in Boston. > > Is anyone here using cololocation services? If so what are your > experiences? On the web I found servercity.com and netroplex.com, but > I also found bostoncolocation.net which looks just like servercity.com > but has different prices, so I'm wondering if they are legitimate. > > -- > R. David Murray www.bitdance.com > > > > -- > Rich Roth > Webmaster/Steering Committee Member > Hidden-tech http://www.hidden-tech.net > The Talent you need is right here, > Join and share your skills > > > _______________________________________________ > Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net > Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net > > You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion list. > If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members > page on the Hidden Tech Web site. > http://www.hidden-tech.net/members > -- Sincerely, Michael Klatsky --- TNR Global, LLC VP-Systems http://www.tnrglobal.com PO Box 550, Greenfield, MA 01302 michaelk at tnrglobal.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.hidden-tech.net/pipermail/hidden-discuss/attachments/20110319/de133943/attachment.html