I'd argue that, today, an SD card is waaaaaay more reliable than a tape. And a lot easier/faster to back up. I don't really understand what the 'limitations' of SD are for him. But I only do consumer video. Adam Bauer wrote: >> My son has been working with a small $250 video camera that uses memory chips, >> rather than tapes. He is frustrated with its limitations and wants to get an >> HD video camera that uses tapes instead of memory chips. He has budgeted about >> $1,000, but can go up to $1,500. >> >> Does anyone know, >> a) is this the best way for him to go? (he does a LOT of video editing,) >> b) is this a reasonable amount to budget, and >> c) what would be a good camera for him to get? >> >> Thanks, >> stephanie >> > > Hi Stephanie, > When I went to India and Afghanistan to work on a film/media project, I > faced exactly this scenario, and my girlfriend/travel partner at the time > was media person. > > She preferred tapes. No chance of a simple digi-glitch ruining all your work > and leaving you no backups. Yeah, you've got to capture all the video onto a > drive for editing, but that's OK.