Thanks Chris, several people have recommended similar approaches. Unfortunately, our data is covered under HIPAA laws, and there is no way we can use a shared infrastructure. As such, I am concerned that as I try to benchmark for future needs, I would not be able to get a true test that would help me gauge what system characteristics I need to look at. -Dan On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Chris Hoogendyk <hoogendyk at bio.umass.edu>wrote: > > > Daniel Fried wrote: > >> I have a resource intensive application that I need to test for >> performance scaling with hardware, specifically I want to be able to get a >> better idea of where my bottlenecks are by testing the application on >> systems with faster processors/more cores and database performance with >> faster drives. >> >> Can anyone give me some ideas on where I might be able to find some >> systems I can test on? I have a .Net application that talks to a MySQL >> database. The current dev and qa systems require Windows for the >> application, but can run MySQL on either Windows (same or different system) >> or Linux. >> >> Any help would be appreciated. >> > > One of the major points that was made at the Cloud Camp yesterday (by the > folks from TNR Global, who, I believe, were using the Amazon cloud services) > was that it made prototyping and testing incredibly easy and cost effective. > One of their guys described building out a significant sized virtual cluster > to test disaster recovery. Once the test was completed, the whole system > could be torn down. Since there were no physical machines to be spec'ed out, > purchased, set up, configured, etc., the whole process could be done in the > same day, and the cost was just the cost of the resources used that day. > > This would give you the flexibility of doing tests on variable sized > virtual instances. You could run a test today with specifications for number > of compute units, memory and disk size. Using those results you might > continue your development, tweak your settings, and then next week run > another test with a virtual machine specified to twice that number of > compute units, memory, etc. In the time between now and then there are no > physical machines hanging around and no cost. > > Since I haven't done it myself, I can't tell you the cost, and the guy from > TNR Global didn't say what their costs were. Only that they were extremely > affordable and almost nothing compared to the alternative of setting up real > physical machines. So, you'll have to look into the costs for yourself to > know if it works for you. > > > -- > --------------- > > Chris Hoogendyk > > - > O__ ---- Systems Administrator > c/ /'_ --- Biology & Geology Departments > (*) \(*) -- 140 Morrill Science Center > ~~~~~~~~~~ - University of Massachusetts, Amherst > <hoogendyk at bio.umass.edu> > > --------------- > Erdös 4 > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.hidden-tech.net/pipermail/hidden-discuss/attachments/20100421/dfee3a9f/attachment.html