would this be an acceptable use of flash on a homepage? www.reelifeproductions.com (how's that fir creative cross/promotion/infoquest) seriously, I welcome your constructive criticisms because one of the things on my 2009 todo list is to overhaul the site... hope I don't need to start putting on my flood gear....;) Regards, Tom Adams, Director/Owner www.ReelifeProductions.com, (from iPhone 413.575.9707 ) • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••••••••••••••••• using technology to enlighten, entertain and educate since 1998) cool digital video stuff...not boring or dumb • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••••••••••••••••• Tom's Portal: web.mac.com/ReelifeProductions Phish Documentary (work in progress) www.AllMyPlasticMelonDreams.info 2008 Telly Award Winner: "Establishing a Local Historic District" On Jan 22, 2009, at 2:33 PM, "Edbride-PR" <Ed at edbride-pr.com> wrote: > ** Be sure to fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's > area. > ** If you did, we all thank you. > > > The sound is coming in, regardless of whether you play it or not, so > you're not saving bandwidth by turning off the sound. But you're > probably lowering your blood pressure. > > I join the chorus of those who despise Flash on a home page. Finding > the Exit or Next button to escape from Flash isn't exactly my > definition of sticky. Spending 20 seconds looking? Wow...that's some > qualifier: it assumes visitors are so captivated in their search > that they will endure this wait, and Flash, looking for "just their > info." Sounds like the brand is all about testing customers' patience. > > Ed > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Kopec" <t_e_k at comcast.net> > To: <hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net> > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 1:24 PM > Subject: Re: [Hidden-tech] Restaurant websites built using Adobe > Flash? > > >> >> At 09:52 AM 1/22/2009, Info @ WinansCreative.com wrote: >> >>> We had cases where SEO wasn't that big a concern to our client, >>> and we explained the risks/benefits of using Flash well in >>> advance. The goal was to get people to spend more than 20 seconds >>> on the site looking for just their info, so that they could really >>> experience what the brand was all about. >> >> IMHO, this is a serious problem. You are wasting my time for your >> (client's) goals. In general, if I get stuck in eye candy when I'm >> looking for information (MY goals), I will go somewhere else if >> possible. >> >> While I'm ranting, I generally surf with sound off because of all >> the noisy websites out there. I'd really like to be able to leave >> sounds on, but it is just too distracting and annoying, not to >> mention a waste of bandwidth. >> >> Just my $0.02, foe what it's worth.. >> >> ...tom > > _______________________________________________ > Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net > Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net > > You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion > list. > If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the > Members page on the Hidden Tech Web site. > http://www.hidden-tech.net/members