[Hidden-tech] Microsoft Office suite vs. other options

Don Lesser dlesser at ptraining.com
Fri Dec 11 11:45:42 EST 2009


You make very good points. The problem is somewhat larger than PowerPoint.
Many youth of today have terrible spelling, mix homonyms regularly, and have
short attention spans, all of which can be blamed on a culture that provides
most information through audio and video cut in quick sound bites rather
than the printed word and carefully reasoned arguments. It matters less
whether you get your news on a printed page or website; what matters more is
the content, the accuracy, and the ethical standards of the presenter.



Don Lesser
Pioneer Training, Inc.
139 B Damon Road, Suite 2
Northampton, MA 01060
(413) 387-1040 / (413) 536-1030
(413) 586-0545 (fax)
dlesser at ptraining.com
www.ptraining.com


-----Original Message-----
From: hidden-discuss-bounces at lists.hidden-tech.net
[mailto:hidden-discuss-bounces at lists.hidden-tech.net] On Behalf Of Roger
Williams
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 10:43 AM
To: Frank Aronson
Cc: Hidden-Tech Tech
Subject: Re: [Hidden-tech] Microsoft Office suite vs. other options

   ** Be sure to fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's area.
   ** If you did, we all thank you.


>>>>> Frank Aronson <fsaronson at gmail.com> writes:

  > This will quickly be labeled off-topic, but I have to ask, why does
every
  > Mac vs. PC thread always devolve into a Microsoft mugging?

Neither Duane's nor my comments were intended it to be Microsoft "mugging".
Other tools that copy Word and PowerPoint have exactly the same problems.

The point that we and Edward Tufte were making is that each of these design
tools have an inherent "cognitive style" -- a specific built-in approach to
using information to solve problems -- and a user interface that encourages
certain sorts of thinking, problem-solving, and design decisions, and
discourages others.

  > As for the thumping that PowerPoint is getting in this thread...  it's
  > kind of like blaming the hammer and nail for bad construction.  It's not
  > the tool, but the person wielding the tool who is ultimately at fault.

You make a good point: responsibility for poor presentations lies with the
presenter.  But it's more complicated than that.  PowerPoint (and similar
slideware) has a distinctive, definite, well-enforced, and widely-practiced
cognitive style that is contrary to serious analytic thinking. PowerPoint
actively facilitates the making of lightweight presentations.

Tufte identifies the characteristics of PowerPoint's cognitive style as
foreshortening of evidence and thought, low spacial resolution, a deeply
hierarchical single-path structure as the model for organising every type of
content, breaking up narrative and data into slides and minimal fragments,
rapid temporal sequencing of thin information rather than focussed spatial
analysis, conspicuous decoration and fluff, a preoccupation with format not
content, and an attitude of commercialism that turns everything into a sales
pitch.

He makes the point that a better metaphor for presentations is good
teaching.
Teachers seek to explain something with credibility -- which of course is
what
many presentations are _trying_ to do.  But the core ideas of teaching --
explanation, reasoning, finding things out, questioning, content, evidence,
credible authority -- are contrary to this hierarchical market-pitch
approach.

-- 
Roger Williams <roger at qux.com>
Chief Technical Officer, Qux Corporation
433 West Street, Suite 8, Amherst, MA 01002, USA
Tel +1 413 253-6400 * Fax +1 508 302-0230 * GSM +1 508 287-1420
_______________________________________________
Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net
Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net

You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion list.
If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members   
page on the Hidden Tech Web site.
http://www.hidden-tech.net/members




Google

More information about the Hidden-discuss mailing list