My two cents: ACT, since 6.0 has declined steadily in its usability and stability. I recently received a check for $35 as my share of a settlement for a suit that someone brought against ACT 2005 for not delivering the promised features. I have one client in ACT 2007 who has problems with it. (Birthday fields do not refresh-you are always looking at the birthday of the previous contact you viewed, even though the correct birthday is in the record). ACT promised that the new version will fix the problem, but wants to charge them full price for each copy to fix an acknowledged bug. It locks down the MSDB engine, making backup of the SQL versions hard (at least it used to). I got the impression that the newest owners were trying to upsell you to their higher end version by providing the minimal support needed to keep current ACT customers from leaving. I used Goldmine for one client, but was not very happy with it. It has a lot of fans, so I think that if you take the time to learn it, you'll like it. ACT, through 6.0, was so easy to use, set up, customize, and link to with an SDK that I think I became spoiled. Microsoft's offerings are either Business Contact Manager for non-Exchange offices or CRM 3.0 for large organizations. The Business Contact Manager package won't work if you do have Exchange and CRM 3.0 is aimed at large corporations and I never wanted to take the time to work with it. (It's not that I am so Microsoft-centric that I have to have an MS solution; I get all MS software "free" as part of my paid Certified Partnership with them, so I tend to look at their stuff first.) Business Contact Manager is a free download for any Outlook user and installs into Outlook, if you want to look at that. I implemented SUGAR CRM for one client. I found that, if you are willing to do some PHP programming, you can do whatever you want. However, the documentation implied that you could easily convert a group of LEADS to CONTACTS and COMPANIES (Sugar keeps these separate from leads and when you convert a lead to a contact, you need to create/link it to a Company record). You cannot-you must do it one record at a time. I also found the reporting and display not very flexible unless you were willing to modify the forms using PHP. My Sugar contact apologized for the error, but with 2,000 leads already entered, I was pretty disgusted. Since they had been modified, it was not practical to simply recreate the database. My own fault, I suppose, for not testing it more extensively before deploying. I like the idea of a hosted web program, especially for a geographically diverse group of salespeople or for cross platform compatibility, but for my own office, I bought a program that would extract my existing ACT data into an Access database, then spent about 5 hours tweaking the resulting database so that I could use it for new contacts, notes, and opportunities. We do scheduling in Exchange and I have to copy and paste the e-mail address from the ACT.mdb to Outlook, but when I get some time, I'll import the e-mail addresses from the database into Exchange and make it a public address book. It is not perfect, but it works for our needs and since the data is in Access, I have complete control over it. I haven't used Sales Force and the people I know who do are part of a large organization. For me, the issue with open source is that you have to be able to and want to get into the guts of the app if you want to modify it more than casually and you have to do it with a minimal amount of documentation and support. That limits something like Sugar for me, although if you are comfortable with PHP/MySQL, it makes it a good business opportunity to sell and customize for a client. That's part of a larger question about open source, I suppose. Don Lesser Pioneer Training, Inc. 139B Damon Road, Suite 2 Northampton, MA 01060 (413) 387-1040 / (413) 536-1030 (413) 586-0545 (fax) <mailto:dlesser at ptraining.com> dlesser at ptraining.com <http://www.ptraining.com> www.ptraining.com From: hidden-discuss-bounces at lists.hidden-tech.net [mailto:hidden-discuss-bounces at lists.hidden-tech.net] On Behalf Of DAVID F. FARKAS Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 12:35 AM To: Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net Subject: [Hidden-tech] ACT! vs. SalesForce Hi folks... I'm wondering if any of you can either compare or share your strong preferences for one of these two CRM solutions: ACT! software or SalesForce.com online (the free minimalist solution.) If you have experience with SalesForce, have you tried the integration with GoogleApps? Anything you can give me will be helpful. Thanx! Blissings, Da/\id _____ LOVE is the Renewable Resource DAVID FRANKLIN FARKAS www.HouseHealing.com <http://www.househealing.com/> www.YourChocolateHeaven.com <http://www.yourchocolateheaven.com/> _____ How can they say my life is not a success? Have I not, for more than sixty years, got enough to eat and escaped being eaten? ~ Logan P. Smith _____ No trees were destroyed by sending this message. However, a significant number of electrons were sorely inconvenienced _____ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.hidden-tech.net/pipermail/hidden-discuss/attachments/20080924/8e81fb53/attachment.htm