At Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:15:17 -0400 ussailis at shaysnet.com wrote: > > ** The author of this post was a Good Dobee. > ** You too can help the group > ** Fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's area. > ** If you did, we all thank you. > > > Moons ago (perhaps in '97) I acquired a box of 500 1.44 floppies with AOL > V2.5, for $10. Almost gone now. Yet, I still recycle them, even using one > Monday for a spread-sheet back-up. > > I believe that 1.44 floppies will work just fine in a 720K drive. And > perhaps the other way around. There was a lot of BS during the "floppy > wars" about this. One of the improvements had to do with the precision with > which the lead screw in the drive was made, and had nothing to do with the > media at all. Yes, a 1.44M drive can read and write a 720K floppy (at 720K or 640K). I don't know if 720K floppy media can in fact be low-level formatted to 1.44M or not or if the drive will let you even try -- I think the floppies have different 'holes' at the back that the drive uses to sense media type (as well as write-protect). A 720K/640K drive can handle a 1.44M floppy, but probably at 720K/640K -- this is mainly a function of the driver cirtuitry (not quite 'firmware' since floppy drives use pretty much hardwired logic rather than a microcontroller). The difference is bit density (and data rate) -- both 720K/640K and 1.44M floppies all have 80 tracks/side. The 1.44M have twice the bit density. Bit density relates to the heads' geometry and field strength and how much field strength is needed by the media to record a bit and the quality of the media (eg its dropout rate / how dense the magnetic particles are). -- Robert Heller -- Get the Deepwoods Software FireFox Toolbar! Deepwoods Software -- Linux Installation and Administration http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Web Hosting, with CGI and Database heller at deepsoft.com -- Contract Programming: C/C++, Tcl/Tk