At Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:45:11 -0400 ussailis at shaysnet.com wrote: > > ** Be sure to fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's area. > ** If you did, we all thank you. > > > Here's an idea. > > Since I have become the owner of Shaysnet, I have had a chance to look at a > lot of spam. What I have observed is many of my users get the same stuff. > So, couldn't there be a program that says "if X users (let X be some > reasonable number like 4) get the same mail, it is spam, therefore deal > with it" Spamassassin + Mime-Defang > > Of course my "deal with it" would be to collect all the spam for one day > and send it all back to the first spammer of that day. If enough ISPs did > this... That is a waste of time. Spam rarely has a valid return address or rarely has the return address of the spammer. > > > Jim Ussailis > > > > Original Message: > ----------------- > From: htcontact at town-websites.com > Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:48:58 -0600 > To: ssol at interactiveguild.com, hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net > Subject: Re: [Hidden-tech] An Idea about Email > > > ** Be sure to fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's area. > ** If you did, we all thank you. > > > I think the spam problem can be best attacked on ths technical side. > > The protocols for email were established long before anyone imagined SPAM > would become such a problem. There have been a patchwork of afterthought > spam interventions, by ISPs, by email services, and at the end user's PC, > but email by and large continues to use a patchwork on top of old protocols > not suited to the task. I haven't ever really looked at the protocols, > certainly not recently, but I think a starting point should be something > like a real identity registration that can be verified, something like DNS > registration, so you could tell the true source of email without having to > use heuristics to guess at the identity or what the content is. > > Even venturing at an design gets complicated enough to require a task force > and years of discussions, never mind implementation. But I think a better > technology could make it easier to weed out spammers - through legal means > or simpler, more accurate screening; while also having a lighter impact on > small organizations and business that need reliable ability to contact > their clients than the current patchwork. > > Charlie Heath > Town Websites > > > _______________________________________________ > Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net > Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net > > You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion list. > If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members > page on the Hidden Tech Web site. > http://www.hidden-tech.net/members > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > mail2web - Check your email from the web at > http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web > > > _______________________________________________ > Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net > Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net > > You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion list. > If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members > page on the Hidden Tech Web site. > http://www.hidden-tech.net/members > > -- Robert Heller -- Get the Deepwoods Software FireFox Toolbar! Deepwoods Software -- Linux Installation and Administration http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Web Hosting, with CGI and Database heller at deepsoft.com -- Contract Programming: C/C++, Tcl/Tk