Responses below Anne Campbell wrote: > One of my clients has recently raised a question about what activities are > billable. I'm a Web designer, and I pride myself on my honesty in billing (I > don't dawdle or pad my hours). I'd love to have some feedback about what's fair > to charge for. > > When I'm working on an hourly basis rather than a flat per-project rate, I bill > for time spent: discussing plans for the design (whether on the phone, in > person, or by e-mail); creating and revising the comp; creating the graphics; > coding the HTML and CSS; debugging so the site looks good in all browsers; > uploading files; and all the project-related correspondence that happens along > the way. > > I *don't* bill for time spent generating invoices or contracts, or > correspondence about same. If a client and I are friendly and spend ten minutes > chatting about what we did over the weekend, of course I don't bill for that. > If I make an obvious, careless mistake that's my fault, I usually don't bill > for the time it takes to fix it. > All the above is fine - although if you have to do especially complex billing because of client request, I do change, this is specifically true of time spend for some government projects. As for mistakes, time is time, it would take a really dumb mistake for me not to billing a client. You are being paid for the time, and the rate is set based on your level of experience, and since all humans make mistakes occasionally -- that is part of the project and hence billable. > This particular client was concerned because on a recent project, there were a > lot of CSS-related incompatibilities between browsers, which took time to > unravel. She thought the "time spent correcting things that really ought to > have been part of the original work, designing for a variety of browsers and > screens" was unreasonable. She also believes that if I "answer the odd e-mail," > that should not be a billable activity. > Both are very billable in my book -- they are part of the complex world of the Internet. > I certainly don't want to cheat this client, or any client. If it were you, > what would you do in this situation? > It sounds to me like this client has no qualms about getting some of your time for free. > BTW, my work is pro-rated by the quarter-hour. This client is a small > for-profit company but is paying the hourly rate I normally charge nonprofit > organizations. > Even more of a verification that this client is looking to getting paying less than they should. -- Rich Roth CEO On-the-net Bringing you complex online systems since the net was young http://www.tnrglobal.com - http://www.on-the-net.com/rr/