Perhaps I misunderstood the question. If by "wearing a beeper" the question merely meant being on-call, then of course there should be some consideration. I was addressing the specific of wearing a beeper, as if that meant something more than simply being on-call. The beeper gives you more flexibility (as does a cellphone). But I advocate compensation when someone is on-call, perhaps (as someone else mentioned) a certain minimum, which would be applied against a higher rate if an emergency call materiazed. Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: "Florence I.T." <florenceit at comcast.net> To: <Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 9:03 PM Subject: Re: [Hidden-tech] What to charge for emergency support ? Edbride-PR wrote: > > >Charge for wearing beeper? I don't think so, anymore than you'd charge for > >keeping a cellphone nearby. You're charging for your time, the beeper just > >makes it easier for the client to find you. > > > > > > > This approach is fine if you don't put too much weight on IF you can > respond. I offer similiar currently (No guaranteed off hours support, > but if you catch me and I come in, it's 150% normal rates). And that's > not higher only because I value the good relationships I have with > existing clients. Expecting a highly skilled professional to respond to > you immediately 24 hours a day is a LOT to ask, and should be expensive > that's all I can say....