Like you, I have always kept my registration and my hosting at separate companies. I register with GoDaddy, and host with HostGator. It just always felt safer to have that split, and now you've given me a reason for my intuition, one that makes perfect sense. I had one site with Siteground for a year, on the strong recommendation of the web designer who set it up. I saw no real difference in the performance, but when they tripled the price after the first year was up, I left in disgust. I have been pretty happy with HostGator. Their tech support is excellent and their uptime seems no worse than anyone else's. I think I've been with them about 10 years, after using several other hosts for a few years each. My needs are simpler than yours, Mark, so I have no need of fancy features. Shel Horowitz - "The Transformpreneur" ________________________________________________ Contact me to bake in profitability while addressing hunger, poverty, war, and catastrophic climate change * First business ever to be Green America Gold Certified * Inducted into the National Environmental Hall of Fame * Certified speaker: International Platform Association http://goingbeyondsustainability.com mailto:shel at greenandprofitable.com 413-586-2388 Award-winning, best-selling author of 10 books. Latest:Guerrilla Marketing to Heal the World (co-authored with Jay Conrad Levinson) Watch my TEDx Talk, "Impossible is a Dare: Business for a Better World" http://www.ted.com/tedx/events/11809 (move your mouse to "event videos") _________________________________________________ On Thu, Dec 10, 2020, 7:41 PM Mark D. Hamill via Hidden-discuss < hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net> wrote: > It seems every few years we swap hosting recommendations. Based on a > conversation a few years ago on this list, I chose Siteground and have been > reasonably happy with it, at least until recently. > > Of course a good host depends on your needs. Shared hosting has worked > pretty well for me for my modest needs but I have used virtual private > servers in the past. In general, hosts seem to have upped their game with > shared hosting and I rarely encounter performance issues that I saw in the > past. > > One of the big trends, which is affecting hosts like GoDaddy and > Siteground, is they are becoming virtual web hosts. GoDaddy is moving to > Amazon's cloud and Siteground to Google's. So presumably these hosts are > saving a lot of money because they aren't maintaining their own server > rooms. It's generally complicated to set up hosting in the cloud, so they > seem to add value by putting up pretty interfaces. Siteground had impressed > me with its all solid state infrastructure, but presumably all the major > cloud vendors are now solid state and since Siteground is virtual now (or > moving that way), it's not that big of a deal. > > So looking at informed recommendations for shared and VPS web hosts in > particular. I'm a little prejudiced against virtual hosts, but I'm guessing > it's a trend that will only continue and at some point virtually all web > hosts will be virtual. I prefer hosts that build in value. Siteground, for > example, includes free Let's Encrypt certificates and their maintenance > built in. This seems to be becoming more standardized but curiously last I > checked GoDaddy doesn't do this. > > I attended a podcamp in Boston last year. A representative from Dreamhost > talked about how they fought off legal efforts by the Trump administration > to make them monitor their servers proactively. I don't think they are a > virtual hosting company. Anyone have experiences with Dreamhost? > > I do have one recommendation when it comes to registrars. I keep my > registrar separate from my hosting so I can quickly divorce hosts when > needed. I see registrars as commodities. I've been happy with namesilo.com. > They seem to be the cheapest out there and they throw in extras, like > privacy protection, for free. Most of my clients use GoDaddy and I think > their registrar services are obscenely priced. But I'm sure registrars are > going through changes too. It might be good to trade notes on registrars > too. > > Thanks and I'm sure our discussion will be useful to many. > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net > Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net > > You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion list. > If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members > page on the Hidden Tech Web site. > http://www.hidden-tech.net/members > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.hidden-tech.net/pipermail/hidden-discuss/attachments/20201211/b29d286c/attachment.html>