I don't know your situation. But as a user I've just about had it to here with "secure" email solutions. They are always a headache and always cause me to do all kinds of not secure things in order to use them. You may not be in a position to do so, but if you can, I hope you would consider just how much security is really necessary. For example, I really do NOT want to get my health care stuff on some kind of "Secure" email. The likelihood of something going astray is small and inconsequential. Banking information though, I understand. I also understand that health care providers are working within HIPPA requirements and that other people have circumstances, abusive relationships and so on that necessitate security. On 4/8/2020 11:25 AM, Stephen Michel via Hidden-discuss wrote: > Very short version: *Probably* the best thing is to use Signal, not email. > > Short version: Email isn't secure. I can write (or better, link to) a > longer explanation of why that's the case, but the bottom line is that > it just wasn't built for privacy. You *can* build a secure system on > top of email, by encrypting things before you send them through email > using a different tool (pgp), and then decrypting them on the other > end. But that's hard for most people to set up and still lacks a > couple important security features (forward secrecy, metadata > security). There's also providers like protonmail which add a *little* > security. While acknowledging that something is better than nothing, > there's still flaws in these systems and you shouldn't think you're > getting strong security from using them. > > Longer version (in a follow-up email): This question as it stands is > impossible to answer well, bec ause security is a spectrum. Edward > Snowden, the president, and you all have very different security > needs. In order to arrive at a good answer, you need to figure out > your security model. > > - Who do you want privacy from? Random everyday people? Friends? An > abusive ex/partner? The government? A hacker? For whoever it is, are > they doing it en masse or targeting you specifically? > - Who will you be communicating with? If it's an elderly > parent/grandparent, you need something simple enough that they can use > it. Otherwise, it doesn't matter how good the security is. > - What information are you trying to protect? Is it just the contents > of the conversation, or also the people you're talking to (eg, a > whistleblower contacting a journalist needs this). > > For most "regular" people, I think Signal is a pretty good fit, and > that's why I recommended it given I know nothing about your use case. > -- > I try to write short, functional emails. > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 08:38, Christine Dutton via Hidden-discuss > <hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net> wrote: >> Hello Hidden Tech Folks: >> Please recommend free favorite secure email services. >> Thank you! >> Christine >> *Christine Dutton* >> *Dutton Consulting * >> *413-626-6377* >> *Find me on Facebook here! <https://www.facebook.com/duttonconsulting/>* >> * >> * > > _______________________________________________ > Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net > Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net > > You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion list. > If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members > page on the Hidden Tech Web site. > http://www.hidden-tech.net/members -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.hidden-tech.net/pipermail/hidden-discuss/attachments/20200408/6ecc941f/attachment.html>