[Hidden-tech] proofing a website

[Mark D. Hamill]

Browser compliance with web standards is certainly better than it was. In
most cases unless you are using some obscure features of CSS and HTML there
should be few issues to deal with. Simple tends to be good, and elegant.

For dynamic pages using jQuery, jQueryUI and jQuery Mobile should work
across all browsers, but jQuery 3 does not support IE 8 or earlier versions.

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Town Websites <townwebsites at gmail.com>
wrote:

> True, except that there are many standards, and many devices still in use
> were created to meet different standards.
>
>
>
> For example, html5, which is the standard many people want to design to
> now, is not nearly 100% implemented.  Here’s a website that purports to
> rate html5 compliance; this page shows compliance over time for top
> browsers: https://html5test.com/results/desktop.html .
>
>
>
> For websites I’ve built for clients, I’ve generally avoided html5 except
> where the elements gracefully degrade, though would evaluate this with the
> client at this point since html5 is so much more interesting than earlier
> standards.
>
>
>
> In the old days, many developers supported Internet Explorer 6 years after
> IE7  replace it, even after Microsoft announced it was end of life, because
> there was still a significant installed base.  These days, it seems that
> developers care less about working on 100% of the installed base.  For
> example, many android browsers just a few years old can’t load a number of
> significant websites, which are ‘standards complaint’ but based on newer
> standards.  I think that’s more or less reasonable, for the industry,
> though still try to maintain functional websites for html 4 complaint
> browsers even if some features gracefully degrade.
>
>
>
> Charlie Heath
>
> Townwebsites
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* hidden-discuss-bounces at lists.hidden-tech.net [mailto:
> hidden-discuss-bounces at lists.hidden-tech.net] *On Behalf Of *Mark D.
> Hamill
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 20, 2016 4:55 PM
> *To:* Kristi <krystyobolyte at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Dan Belmont Piano Teacher <dbelmont2 at gmail.com>; Hidden Tech
> Discussion List <hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [Hidden-tech] proofing a website
>
>
>
> Technically, if your website is standards compliant you can test by simply
> reducing the width of the browser window and see what happens. Responsive
> content is usually either hidden or pushed below the main content.
>
>
>
> Just in case it's not being done make sure your HTML is version 5 and that
> you validate your HTML and CSS with w3.org's validators.
>
>
>
> http://validator.w3.org/
>
> https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
>
>
>
> Browser manufacturers now go through a lot of trouble to ensure they
> comply with standards. There are some exceptions of course, but writing
> standards compliant HTML, CSS and Javascript is probably the fastest and
> cheapest way to address potential incompatibility issues. Those browsers
> with quirks are probably worth ignoring until they fix their browsers.
>
>
>
> There are some browser quirks you can decide if you want to address or
> not. Retinal displays like retinal images (2x the detail) and images served
> to these devices may look fuzzy. Wordpress has a plugin that detects these
> devices and can serve retinal images. Also, Apple devices promote their
> Apple touch icons and some developers will make sure their markup supports
> Apple's peculiar standard.
>
>
>
> https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/
> AppleApplications/Reference/SafariWebContent/ConfiguringWebApplications/
> ConfiguringWebApplications.html
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Kristi <krystyobolyte at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> you can try this, too:
>
>
>
> https://search.google.com/search-console/mobile-friendly
>
>
> Kristi A. Bodin
>
> Montague, MA
>
> c: 413-695-9848 <(413)%20695-9848>
>
> krystyobolyte at gmail.com
>
> http://twitter.com/MarthazKristi
>
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/kristibodin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Dan Belmont Piano Teacher <
> dbelmont2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone --
>
>
>
>    What specific computers, phones, and tablets should I view my website
> on to
>
> make sure that it is formatted correctly everywhere ? I am assuming I
> should just look
>
> at the most popular ones ...
>
>
>
> Thanks !
>
>
>
> Dan Belmont
>
> Piano Teacher
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net
> Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net
>
> You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion list.
> If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members
> page on the Hidden Tech Web site.
> http://www.hidden-tech.net/members
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net
> Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net
>
> You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion list.
> If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members
> page on the Hidden Tech Web site.
> http://www.hidden-tech.net/members
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Cogito ergo boggum?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net
> Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net
>
> You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion list.
> If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members
> page on the Hidden Tech Web site.
> http://www.hidden-tech.net/members
>



-- 
Cogito ergo boggum?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.hidden-tech.net/pipermail/hidden-discuss/attachments/20161221/e11b5da8/attachment.html