[Hidden-tech] Any experience with a Virus that attacksdocuments?

Chris Hart, MyMacTech.com chris at chrishart.net
Sat Jan 17 09:25:38 EST 2015


Yes, Bruce, a good anti-virus, that's up to date, should identify
Cryptolocker variants and prevent them from becoming resident (and thus
stopping them from encrypting your files).  But..... There is always a
window of time in which new virus variants are spreading in the wild, before
the antivirus makers identify them, and an update their definitions.  That's
the time when you're at risk.

That's why Cryptoprevent is so valuable -- it's your only protection during
that window of time.  As you observed, Cryptoprevent is not a background
process and thus won't drag the system.  However, there is a premium edition
of Cryptoprevent, that does actively update itself; so, that it's aware of
how to protect against new variants of Cryptolocker.  Even still, I would
not expect this to use significant system resources.

Chris Hart

    • Computer Support & Technology Consulting

        for Connecticut and Western Massachusetts

            Tel: 860-291-9393

                http://www.MyMacTech.com


From:  Bruce Hooke <bghooke at att.net>
Date:  Friday, January 16, 2015 at 11:51 AM
To:  Chris Hart <chris at chrishart.net>,
<Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net>
Subject:  Re: [Hidden-tech] Any experience with a Virus that
attacksdocuments?

A quick clarification. I just did some more reading and it turns out
Cryptoprevent is not running all the time. It sets some policy rules in
Windows that should prevent the Cryptolocker software from running.
 
- Bruce

From: Bruce Hooke <bghooke at att.net>
Date: Friday, January 16, 2015 at 11:27 AM
To: Chris Hart <chris at chrishart.net>, <Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net>
Subject: Re: [Hidden-tech] Any experience with a Virus that
attacksdocuments?

Thank you, Chris, for this very informative email. While, as you said,
anti-virus software won't quarrantine the affected files, do you know if
properly up-to-date anti-virus software should catch the initial "virus" (if
that's the right name for it) that causes the documents to be encrypted? I
am considering installing the Cryptoprevent software but it is presumably
yet another background process that has to be there and running all the
time, using system resources.
 
Thanks,
Bruce



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.hidden-tech.net/pipermail/hidden-discuss/attachments/20150117/6610006b/attachment.html 


Google

More information about the Hidden-discuss mailing list