Get rid of belly fat, boost energy levels, and sleep better http://www.hkcwkrell.us/3663/213/481/1676/3406.10tt64633133AAF9.php Unsub- http://www.hkcwkrell.us/3663/213/481/1676/3406.10tt64633133AAF10.html The CIA had Tamerlan Tsarnaev's name put into a terror watchlist after being contacted by Russian authorities in 2011, sources told Fox News -- raising more questions about why the Boston bomber's trip to Russia the following year didn't raise more red flags.Sources say the Russians contacted the FBI once in March 2011, and several months later they contacted the CIA about Tsarnaev.In October 2011, the CIA sent information to many federal agencies and to "the watchlisting system" about him, the sources say. That step ultimately put him on the vast TIDE database of people potentially tied to terrorism cases.The FBI has said previously that it was told Tsarnaev was a "follower of radical Islam" and was preparing to travel to a foreign country to join unspecified underground groups. The FBI said that it responded by interviewing Tsarnaev and family members, but found no terrorism activity.In early 2012, Tsarnaev would travel to Russia for six months. The nature of that trip is still unclear.Two top Republican senators are now calling for a Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing on the Boston Marathon bombings, as lawmakers question whether enough was done to prevent the attack.Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Kelly Ayotte, R-NH, requested the hearing Wednesday, saying "it has become increasingly apparent that more questions need to be answered regarding the failure to prevent this tragedy."The senators cited the reporting by Fox News an Thursday, April 25, on the Southern Methodist University campus in Dallas, Texas, four living presidents Jimmy Carter, No. 39; George H.W. Bush, No. 41; Bill Clinton, No. 42, and Barack Obama, No. 44 will honor one of their colleagues, George W. Bush, the 43rd president of the United States, at the dedication of his presidential library.So I take this occasion to remind my fellow liberal Democrats, many of whom continue to attack Bush in harsh and personal terms, of three things about him that I dont think they understand or appreciate.First, while there were many polices under Bush with which liberal Democrats (myself included) disagreed such as tax cuts, the Iraq War and not paying for either (as well as the Afghan war) with current revenues rather than borrowed money there must be a distinction between disagreement and personal attack.For example, many Democrats still use the lie word in describing Bushs rationale for the Iraq War that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. This turned out to be wrong.But Democrats in the Clinton administration also believed Saddam had WMDs, as did most experts in the U.S. intelligence community.Our politics have become so poisoned and our government so dysfunctional precisely because too many people on both sides cant make a distinction between lies and being sincerely wrong.Second, Bush is known for his brilliant slogan when he first ran in 2000, describing himself as a compassionat -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.hidden-tech.net/pipermail/hidden-discuss/attachments/20140107/1d3f4775/attachment.html