We got a hp scanjet # 5530 which has a auto-feeder for most sized photos, it loads 10-20 photos per set, and only requires a small bit of babying. That one is a bit older - I'm sure there are newer ones today. Rich On 5/3/2013 3:09 PM, B. Kimo Lee wrote: > Hi Tori, > > Since they are prints, and you are on a budget, you could buy your own scanner. Canon > LiDE scanners do a fair job and are inexpensive. Maybe you could get an auto-feeder > attachment? > > Good luck, > Kimo > >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *Tori Zopf <tori.zopf at gmail.com <http://tori.zopf@gmail.com/>> >> *Date: *Thu, 2 May 2013 18:37:25 -0400 >> *To: *<Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net >> <http://Hidden-discuss@lists.hidden-tech.net/>> >> *Subject: *[Hidden-tech] Photo digitization services or scanner >> >> ** Be sure to fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's area. >> ** If you did, we all thank you. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Hi everyone! >> >> I am looking to digitize about two wine boxes worth of photos. >> >> I need either: an easy, recent photo scanner that I could rent or potentially >> borrow from someone for several days. >> >> OR >> >> A local service that will scan my photos for under 39 cents per photo. >> >> Does anyone know of either? >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> Tori Zopf >> >> Personal Assistant >> www.torizopf.com <http://www.torizopf.com/> <http://www.torizopf.com >> <http://www.torizopf.com/>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> > -- Rich Roth Webmaster/Steering Committee Member Hidden-tech http://www.hidden-tech.net The Talent you need is right here, Join and share your skills ((Sponsored by Thrives Media)) http://www.thrivesmedia.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.hidden-tech.net/pipermail/hidden-discuss/attachments/20130503/137c0407/attachment-0002.html