The fundamental question is... why didn't any politicians allow time for the tech community to respond to proposed taxes before blunderingly passing something "they didn't intend"? I am unsatisfied with a fix to the tax; we deserve a fix to why this happened. On Aug 12, 2013 11:53 AM, "Jeff Rutherford" <jeffrutherford at gmail.com> wrote: > ** Be sure to fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's area. > ** If you did, we all thank you. > > > > Response from Rep. Stephen Kulik. I encourage everyone to contact state > legislators about this tax. They need to hear from a lot of people! > > Jeff Rutherford > 413-475-0087 > > Begin forwarded message: > > *From:* "Kulik, Stephen - Rep. (HOU)" <Stephen.Kulik at mahouse.gov> > *Date:* August 8, 2013, 10:05:40 PM EDT > *To:* Jeff Rutherford <jeffrutherford at gmail.com> > *Subject:* *RE: New IT services tax in Massachusetts - constituent > communication* > > Jeff, > > Thanks very much for sharing your concerns about this. As you know, the > legislature scaled back governor Patrick's much more expansive tax proposal > that he submitted in January. Our intent was to craft something more > limited and narrower in scope. I am aware of the concerns that have been > raised by some in the business community in the past few weeks. We are > looking at these concerns very carefully, as we do disagree on some of the > interpretations being talked about. If we have created something that was > not our intent, we have promised to revisit and change it. It is certainly > not our intent to raise $500 million as some claim, and to harm our tech > sector. Our estimate is that this will raise about $160 million, and apply > to a limited number of services. This will be clarified in the coming > weeks as DOR writes the regulations. This is a work in progress, so stay > tuned, and I appreciate your input. > > Best, > > Steve > > *Rep. Stephen Kulik* > > *First Franklin District* > > Vice Chairman, House Ways & Means Committee > > State House, Room 238 1 Sugarloaf Street > > Boston, MA 02133 South Deerfield, MA 01373 > > 617-722-2380 413-665-7200 > > Email: Stephen.Kulik at mahouse.gov <Rep.Stephenkulik at hou.state.ma.us> > ------------------------------ > *From:* Jeff Rutherford [jeffrutherford at gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:12 PM > *To:* Kulik, Stephen - Rep. (HOU) > *Subject:* New IT services tax in Massachusetts - constituent > communication > > Representative Kulik, > > I'm a resident of Conway, MA. I have worked in public relations for > digital companies for the past 16 years. I'm writing you to strongly urge > you to do everything within your power to stop the new IT services tax > immediately. I don't think you or any of the other legislators realize the > damage you've already caused. > > The IT and information economy is going to be the driver of the American > economy for many years to come. By passing the new IT services tax, you've > basically shut down Massachusetts from thriving as a state in the future. > Venture capitalists are now re-considering their future investments in > Massachusetts digital companies. > > I understand that you get a lot of passionate emails and contact from > constituents. Again, I urge you to take this very, very seriously. I think > because of the legislature's lack of understanding of the software business > - you've just fired the first shot in crippling the state's IT economy. I'm > not saying that out of hyperbole. I'm very serious. Damage has already been > done, and the legislature HAS to repeal this tax immediately. > > Here are some additional points: > > This tax was levied on software and IT services as part of a > transportation bill. In fact, there are many IT and software-related > companies in Massachusetts whose employees work from home on a regular > basis - or the companies are virtual companies where every employee works > from home. IT services and software companies should not bear the > responsibility for funding a transportation infrastructure that their > companies often don't use - especially when compared with other industries > within the state. > > This bill was clearly written by someone who does not understand the > information economy. The bill is confusing, opaque, arcane, and clearly > written by someone who doesn't understand the IT economy. If the > legislature wanted to tax IT and software services in Massachusetts, why > didn't they have the decency to hire a law firm familiar with the industry > to write the legislation? The fact that the legislature didn't take that > step clearly proves that the Massachusetts legislature doesn't respect or > care much about an industry that is vitally important to the future of the > state economy. > > The Massachusetts legislature and governmental organizations need to > decide - do they want Massachusetts to be competitive in the information > economy? By passing this bill, the answer is clearly NO. Venture capital > remains a huge driver of investment in IT startups. The Massachusetts > legislature waved a huge red flag for VCs when they passed this bill. That > flag currently reads - DO NOT INVEST IN MASSACHUSETTS' DIGITAL START UPS - > spend your money in Silicon Valley or Chicago or New York City. Do not > invest in Massachusetts, because the state is being administered by > legislators who are going to pass regulations hampering IT businesses - > regulations written by people who don't understand (or care to understand) > your industry. > > On a personal level, I'm flabbergasted by this tax. Sure, you can make > lots of arguments about the revival of small manufacturing and lots of > other industries. However, the impact of the IT and information economy is > only going to grow. IT and software will eventually impact almost every > single industry - agriculture, healthcare, manufacturing, etc. The cities > and states that create hospitable environments for IT and software > companies will thrive in the future - the states who tax an IT industry it > doesn't understand will not thrive. > > If Massachusetts wants its economy to grow, and the state's economic > developments are sincere, it needs to do everything it can to increase the > growth of the IT industry and IT investments within the state. This tax is > the wrong idea at the wrong time. > > Please take this seriously and repeal the IT services tax immediately. > > Sincerely, > > > Jeff Rutherford > PO Box 714 > Conway, MA 01341 > 413-475-0087 > > jeffrutherford at gmail.com > > G+ <https://plus.google.com/117757910488771719712> I Twitter<https://twitter.com/JeffRutherford> > I Blog <http://jeffrutherford.com/> I LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=121886> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net > Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net > > You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion list. > If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members > page on the Hidden Tech Web site. > http://www.hidden-tech.net/members > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.hidden-tech.net/pipermail/hidden-discuss/attachments/20130812/546b8bd3/attachment-0001.html