I'd say, regarding funding and Prop 2.5 override, the point is it would be a debt override which would be funded out of service revenues not by property taxation. It would be like building a water system, backed with bonds guaranteed by the towns (and often subsidized in some way by the state), but with the intention that it would be paid for out of service revenues, not by raising property taxes. By having the towns' backing, the cost of the debt would be significantly reduced, and it would be much easier to access the capital required for the project. Towns wouldn't get to the point of having a Prop 2.5 debt override vote until they have a solid and specific plan in front of them, and likely also a list of subscribers from the town who want the service. The warrant that many towns are voting on this year is to set up an exploratory committee to work with other towns to see if a regional alliance can come up with a solid specific plan. Charlie Heath Town Websites -----Original Message----- From: hidden-discuss-bounces at lists.hidden-tech.net [mailto:hidden-discuss-bounces at lists.hidden-tech.net] On Behalf Of Matthew S. Crocker Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2010 12:51 PM To: hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net Subject: Re: [Hidden-tech] WiredWest fiberoptic broadband ** Be sure to fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's area. ** If you did, we all thank you. Another problem with wireless is when people says 'wireless' they normally mean 'unlicensed wireless'. Unlicensed wireless has a slew of issues with frequency competition. Point to Multipoint unlicensed wireless also half duplex polled network. half duplex networks get destroyed when the users start doing high packet rate full duplex applications (VoIP, peer2peer, VPN, SSH, ...). Wireless is a good short term fill in the gap solution but it isn't a viable long term solution and it doesn't support the future of the Internet. Licensed point to point wireless links can be used for back haul in a regional backbone. A Regional open fiber network would be a huge win for the area. Towns need to be working on funding/prop 2.5 override to budget a last mile fiber build in the town. Connect your town to the state middle mile project and everyone wins. Towns should also not expect the fiber network to generate revenue, If the town makes money off it then it is basically a tax and there are other ways to tax the residents that make more sense. -Matt -- Matthew S. Crocker President Crocker Communications, Inc. PO BOX 710 Greenfield, MA 01302-0710 http://www.crocker.com P: 413-746-2760 _______________________________________________ Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion list. If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members page on the Hidden Tech Web site. http://www.hidden-tech.net/members