> A much better solution, which we now have been using for nearly a year, is > a > wireless data card -- but you've got to have cellular coverage I did this solution TOO, in the after-dialup-before-DSL portion of my internet existence! :-) Actually, it's not good enough to have cell coverage. You have to be within the wireless footprint of the broadband access from the cell carrier of your choice. Lucky for me there's a Verizon tower with this capability less than 1/2 mile from my house. But I have several friends and associates, all of whom have very adequate cell phone coverage in their homes, but all of whom are unable to get wireless broadband coverage, or else the signal is extremely marginal. I'm not sure about Sprint, but Verizon offers a 30-day money-back guarantee on their wireless broadband. You buy the modem (which can be a laptop card or USB format), sign up for a 1- or 2-year contract, and try it at home. I think with a 2-year contract you get a rebate for the full price of the modem, if you keep the service. If it doesn't work, return the modem for a full refund; contract is cancelled with no penalty, and all you pay is a pro-rated portion for the time you had the service. I actually did this once, before they rolled out high-speed access; found it unacceptable, and returned it. A few months later they finished building out their broadband wireless capability and I signed up again. As above, I live quite close to a tower, so I was getting 1300k down / 350k up. (this is like slow DSL) At one point I drove all over town (Becket) with my laptop, testing the service for other interested persons (in the months before DSL came to <some> of Becket). Some places had great service; some had none; in some it degraded to about 500-600k down. Whether this is worth $60/month is up to you. Note again that there is decent cell phone coverage everywhere; the wireless broadband footprint is much more limited. Also note there is a 5GB/month data limit. After this, they assess penalties at a ridiculously high rate. You definitely do NOT want to exceed the quota. One neighbor who tried the service ended up with a $2300 monthly bill! (not kidding). I don't want to speculate about what he was downloading... But even with moderately heavy usage (I watched a few movies on Netflix for example) I never hit 5GB/month in about 6 months of using it. Lastly, Verizon offers two speeds: so-called "national access" which is a pokey 128k down; and "broadband" access as described above. "National Access" is only about 3-5x faster than dialup. For my money, this was not worth $60/month. Which speed you get depends on proximity to a tower, and geography. Another friend is right on the edge of broadband coverage: if we're on a Skype call and the wind blows her directional antenna a little, she drops to National access speeds and we lose voice contact, although we can still IM. - Jeremy ----- Original Message ----- From: "John W. DeWitt" <john at jwdewitt.com> To: <hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 1:02 PM Subject: RE: [Hidden-tech] Does anybody have HughesNet or DirecTVsatellite webaccess? > A much better solution, which we now have been using for nearly a year, is > a > wireless data card -- but you've got to have cellular coverage. We have a > Sprint data card running on a Linksys router supporting 4 PCs with very > decent performance. Even though the specs on bandwidth indicate it should > be > much slower, actual performance (primarily due to the lack of latency) is > generally much better than satellite for web surfing, online banking, > routine e-mailing, and everything else except for streaming high-bandwidth > video and up/downloading large files. > > Hope this helps. > > _________________________ > John W. DeWitt > JW DeWitt | Business Communications > 978-544-1918 Office > 646-232-6620 Mobile > 978-544-1928 Fax > john at jwdewitt.com | www.jwdewitt.com > _________________________