As for being self-regulating and I have found those on the HT list who most know better and should be self-regulating to be the ones that drag a discussion on the longest. So if you want a clean list, everyone should help make it clean and consider when you are really adding to a discussion before posting 'me too' or adding political comments. I have also found such tags as a great idea no one follows. As for Forum only -- I have found we have a group of users, many of who are not of the techical level to effectively use forums (odd as that might sound) -- and while RSS is a good idea - even more pushs the techical boundries. Maybe in the future. Rich/WM On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 06:13:52PM -0800, David Olsson wrote: > It's really hard to draw lines between acceptable and > unacceptable topics. > > Forums probably won't work, because it's ADI, Another > Damn Interface. Most of us just won't go there. > Email is the interface, for better or worse. > > If our group is small enough, we can self-regulate > through dialog: "Hey, can we cut back on requests for > the best pipe cleaner brand? My inbox is suffering > from off-topic bloat." > > If we're too big for that, or even if not, we can use > subject tags like > > [Hidden-tech] [Recommend] Looking for dog masseuse > [Hidden-tech] [Help wanted] Need obsequious designer > [Hidden-tech] [Computer help] Can't send e-mail! > > Honestly, we probably only need the [Recommend] tag, > since that's what comprises most of our extraneous > bandwidth. Maybe the [Computer help] one, too. > > Anyway, that would make it easy to filter out those > topic categories. Nothing's perfect. People will > forget the tags; you'll want to read some of the > recommends but not all of them; la-de-da. > > --- webmaster <webmaster at hidden-tech.net> wrote: > > > > Actually I am glad someone other than me raised this > > issue, and I'd like > > to post some of the 'official position'. > > ...