At Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:26:49 -0500 "Daniel Fried" <dan at creativeconstructs.com> wrote: > > Actually, there is one thing that everyday consumers would realistically use > a really large hard drive for, video editing. Dumping hours and hours of > high quality video onto your system (high quality so you can burn nice > looking DVD's) does take a lot of space. 300GB is a lot, but I certainly > ran into serious problems with an 80GB drive trying to put together a video > of a memorial service for my wife's family, I ended up having to be very > careful about which segments got transferred to the hard drive. A 300GB > hard drive would have made it much easier. > > Of course not everyone wants to edit video on their system, but it is easy > enough to do these days (especially on a Mac... iMovie and iDVD are nice > programs for beginners). But this is a *somewhat* special purpose activity. If *I* were doing video editing, I'd probably have a separate disk just for that purpose. Note: a DVD (holding maybe 3 hours of video) only holds 4.5g, so 300g is like 66 DVDs worth of video, or about 198 hours of video. If one is only doing 'office' stuff (word-processing, spread-sheets, web surfing, E-Mail, and the like), 300g is an *enormous* amount of disk space. > > -Dan > > -----Original Message----- > From: hidden-discuss-bounces at lists.hidden-tech.net > [mailto:hidden-discuss-bounces at lists.hidden-tech.net] On Behalf Of Robert > Heller > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 9:09 AM > To: Tom Adams / Reelife > Cc: Hidden Tech > Subject: Re: [Hidden-tech] Does this sound like a good computer deal? > > ** The author of this post was a Good Dobee. > ** You too can help the group > ** Fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's area. > ** If you did, we all thank you. > > > At Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:12:25 -0800 Tom Adams / Reelife > <reelifeproductions at mac.com> wrote: > > > > > ** The author of this post was a Good Dobee. > > ** You too can help the group > > ** Fill out the survey/skills inventory in the member's area. > > ** If you did, we all thank you. > > > > > > never enjoyed the apple vs. windows debate but i can't resist throwing in > a little fodder for the fire... > > > > > > Frank wrote: > > re: The fact is, they're both valid platforms and you just have to be > comfortable with what you need to work . > > > good point. sometimes I like to wear ripped jeans, other times i like > khakis. > > > > re:Frankly, I think that the claims made by Apple are somewhat overblown > > > disagree. I've never said "wow" to a new microsoft > application...whereas, I literally was flabergasted by some of the new stuff > I've seen in the latest apple keynote address > (http://events.apple.com.edgesuite.net/j47d52oo/event/). I agree these > keynote addresses are a sickening display of apple geeks gawking at their > faithful leader adorned in a black turtleneck and jeans... but all that > aside, I think the apple product is quite an astonishing value. > > > > re:...check out the top of the line Mac Mini. It tends to be light on > disk space (A question for the Mac Apostles: Why would that be?!) > > > the top of the line mac mini has an 80GB hard drive...that's not > "light"...that's plenty of space for the average user (especially for $800) > > I agree here. *I* have never understood the reason for a putting a > 300gb SATA drive on a *PC*. Unless one is downloading (in a wholesale > manor) complete feature films in digital form (eg pirated DVDs) or > something, what do you really need 300gb for? I do software > development and have come nowhere near filling up my 36gig disk. The > current breed of iPods have on 30gig, so 300gig would be enough for 10 > iPods worth of music. At roughly 1 meg/1 minute, this is about 300*1024 > minutes or aboout 300,000 minutes or 5000 hours or 208 *days* of music. > > So, unless one is doing things involving image understanding research (I > worked for awhile at UMass at the Computer Vision Reearch Lab) 300gb is > a truely excesive amount of disk space. Really. Sort of like using a > 40' tractor trailler to get a week's worth of groceries for a family of > four... > > > > > re: A good reason to stick with Windows: Office 2007 > > > Not really. If you use the "Parallels" application, you can run Windows > at the same time you're running Mac OS. Doesn't matter if they EVER release > it on the MAc platform...you can run it immediately if you use the > "Parallels" application. > > > > > > -Tom > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Hidden-discuss mailing list - home page: http://www.hidden-tech.net > > Hidden-discuss at lists.hidden-tech.net > > > > You are receiving this because you are on the Hidden-Tech Discussion list. > > If you would like to change your list preferences, Go to the Members > > page on the Hidden Tech Web site. > > http://www.hidden-tech.net/members > > > > > > -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software -- Linux Installation and Administration http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Web Hosting, with CGI and Database heller at deepsoft.com -- Contract Programming: C/C++, Tcl/Tk